Governance of Mobility Habitus from 2020 to 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22399/ijnasen.20Keywords:
Neural Network Analysis, Appropriation of Space, Mobility Habitus, Social Justice, ViolenceAbstract
The mobility habitus has been identified as an expression of social violence, since it often emerges in contingencies. The objective of this work was to compare the theoretical structure of the mobility habitus with observations in a sample of students from central Mexico. A cross-sectional, explanatory and correlational study was carried out with a sample of 600 university students selected for their confinement and social distancing during the period from 2020 to 2025. The results demonstrate a neural sequence of learning of the mobility habitus that began with the retail sale of addictive substances and culminated in the workplace. This sequence reveals a subsystem of violence that the literature identifies as inherent to synergistic organizations. It is recommended to extend the study to the context of public mobility policies to trace the origin of violence in the State by not only permissing the retail sale of substances, but also by promoting mobility and consumption routes that allow the structuring of organizations and their supply chains.
References
[1]Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.
[2]Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press.
[3]Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.
[4]Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l'espace. Paris: Éditions Anthropos.
[5]Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 17–31.
[6]Bourdieu, P. (2002). Esquisse pour une auto-analyse. Paris: Raisons d’Agir
[7]Kaufmann, V., Bergman, M. M., & Joye, D. (2004). Motility: Mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 745–756.
[8]Hanson, S. (2010). Gender and mobility: New approaches for informing sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture, 17(1), 5–23.
[9]Schwanen, T., & Wang, D. (2014). Well-being, context, and everyday activities in space and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(4), 833–851.
[10]Adey, P. (2010). Mobility. Routledge.
[11]Jensen, O. B. (2009). Flows of meaning, cultures of movement: Urban mobility as meaningful everyday life practice. Mobilities, 4(1), 139–158.
[12]Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity Press.
[13]Aggarwal, C. C. (2018). Neural Networks and Deep Learning: A Textbook. Springer.
[14]Barabási, A.-L. (2016). Network Science. Cambridge University Press.
[15]Haykin, S. (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines (3rd ed.). Pearson.
[16]Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
[17]Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.). Wiley.
[18]DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
[19]Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice Hall.
[20]Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
[21]Manzi, G., Toppeta, F., & Vespignani, A. (2020). Urban mobility networks: Analyzing the interplay between human behavior and infrastructure. Journal of Urban Systems, 34(2), 235–256.
[22]Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.
[23]Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jorge E. Chaparro Medina, Cruz García Lirios, Javier Carreón Guillén, Julio E. Crespo, Vivian Vannesa Vargas Mazuela, Oscar Andrés Cortes Ortiz, Isabel Cristina Rincón Rodríguez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
